| dc.contributor | | en-US |
| dc.creator | Sugiharto, Mugeni; Pusat Humaniora, Kebijakan Kesehatan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Badan Litbang Kesehatan, Kemenkes, Jl. Indrapura 17
Surabaya | |
| dc.date | 2014-11-03 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-17T02:19:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-12-17T02:19:51Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://ejournal.litbang.depkes.go.id/index.php/hsr/article/view/3571 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.22435/bpsk.v17i1 Jan.3571 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://r2kn.litbang.kemkes.go.id:8080/handle/123456789/81997 | |
| dc.description | Introduction: Environmental health program is preventive in activities to improve environmental health quality hence it is useful to improve life quality and human health and is in accord with Kepmenkes RI No 1428/2006 and this environmental health program is mandatory to perform in Puskesmas. Objective: The study was to elaboratie the difference of environmental health program implementation between urban Public Health Care (PHC) and rural PHC, difference of environmental health program performance output based on environmental health staff and availability and feedback giving among PHCs. Methods: Comparative analysis through descriptive method is in form of Rifaskes 2011 table and graphic from secondary data. Population was PHC in Tuban District and it was used as total sample and PHC as analysis unit. Result: PHC in Tuban Regency had not been optimum in performing all environmental health programs. Difference between urban and rural PHCs were the urban PHC didn’t perform all kesling program while the rural PHC performed all environmental health program albeit non maximum. There was difference between sanitarian staff availability between PHCs including in reaching output and there was difference between PHCs that perform performance assessment by obtaining feedback only 9 (27%) PHCs, and feedback benefit had not been influencing environmental health program performance improvement. Less than 50% PHC obtained performance “good” category on public places assessment and other environmental health program was still categorized “poor.” Conclusion: There was difference of environmental health program implementation among PHCs and sanitary staff availability that still lack and feedback benefit had not been effecting environmental health program performance improvement. | en-US |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.publisher | Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Humaniora dan Manajemen Kesehatan | en-US |
| dc.rights | The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Bulletin of Health System Research, and Center of Research and Development for Humaniora and Health Management as publisher of the journal.Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations. The reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in databases and its transmission by any form or media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc. , will be allowed only with a written permission from Bulletin of Health System Research, and Center of Research and Development for Humaniora and Health Management.Bulletin of Health System Research, and Center of Research and Development for Humaniora and Health Management, the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. | |
| dc.source | Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan; Vol 17, No 1 Jan (2014) | en-US |
| dc.source | Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan; Vol 17, No 1 Jan (2014) | id-ID |
| dc.subject | Health | en-US |
| dc.subject | Environmental Health; rural and urban health centre; low good performance | en-US |
| dc.title | Environmental Health Program Implementation at Public Health Center (PHC) in Tuban District East Java Province) (Analysis Data of National Health Fasilities Research 2011) | en-US |
| dc.type | | en-US |
| dc.type | | en-US |
